So, it looks like despite the wailing an reeeeching of the Hambeast, Therapist Yaniv is going to eventually stand trial for his.. her.. its weapons charges relating to the brandishing and discharging a restricted weapon over a livestream on 2019Aug05.
[[Yaniv] is a transgender person identifying as a woman. She testified that she wanted to
validate her identity as female. She saw an online advertisement for hair cutting and styling services placed by a stylist who worked for Hot Mess Salon.
The result is that [Yaniv] has failed to prove discrimination on the basis of her transgender status. The Complaint is dismissed.
This update courtesy of Proletariat Mook. The Jan13 matter was adjourned to 2020Feb10. This is convenient, as Dr Yaniv seems insistent on kicking the can down to road.. even as Dr Yaniv continues to demonstrate aggressive behaviour that would demonstrate the need for a custodial sentence.
Here's a short clip from Roadkill Radio providing an update from someone who isn't afraid to get her hands dirty.
That is very convenient. Hypothetically, it allows for the collation of exculpatory evidence that proves the malicious nature of the prosecution Crown started at the behest of Yaniv, possibly with falsified/distorted information. As demonstrated in Drainville v. Vilchez it is possible in extreme case (extreme like a predator potato) for damages to be awarded in a malicious prosecution case where the defendant wasn’t the police or the Crown, but a private individual. Wherein the informant acted malicuiously and in bad faith, and a malicious prosecution suit is being brought against a private individual.
Although, Adrian Picard seems a bit detached. I think he's retained by Legal Aid, or a state-provided attorney.